Thinkingand Attention
A quick reference. Test the thinking first, then use attention to disengage from what is left.
Use the tabs, the arrow keys, or swipe to move through.
A quick reference. Test the thinking first, then use attention to disengage from what is left.
Two different jobs. Challenging distorted thinking is for faulty reasoning: the thought is inaccurate and testing it against the evidence changes it. Mindfulness is for intrusive thoughts and feelings you want to disengage from: the thought may be accurate, or it may simply keep returning, and arguing with it only feeds it.
Name the thought, spot the pattern, weigh the actual evidence, and write a more accurate version. This is where the thought diary comes in.
Once you have settled on what the evidence supports, the thought will often keep turning up anyway. That is normal. At that point there is nothing left to work out, so stop analysing and practise letting it come and go.
Going straight to mindfulness with a thought you have not tested can feel like avoidance, and the mind keeps returning to it because the question is still open. Going the other way, endlessly re-testing a thought you have already settled, is rumination wearing a productive costume.
Test it once, properly. Then let it be a thought.
Your mind swaps a hard question for an easier one and answers that. Those shortcuts are heuristics, and they are mostly useful. A bias is a shortcut that misfires in the same predictable direction every time. Knowing about one does not switch it off, so the fix is a process, not more effort.
We judge quality by how much work appears to have gone in, rather than by the result.
The forty slide deck reads as more valuable than the one page memo that answered the question. And your own work only counts if it hurt to produce.Once you hold a view, you notice what fits and skim past what does not.
Their two late reports are proof. The nine on time ones never register as evidence.Likelihood gets judged by how easily an example springs to mind.
One project blew out last year, so every new one feels high risk.Others get it wrong because of who they are. You get it wrong because of what was going on.
They missed the deadline because they are disorganised. You missed yours because the brief changed twice.Criticism weighs more and lasts longer than praise.
Nineteen useful comments and one sharp one. Guess which you can quote next month.Continuing because of what has gone in, rather than what it returns from here.
Stopping feels like wasting six months, rather than saving the next six.Biases are shortcuts everyone shares. Distortions are more personal: habits in how you interpret things, usually about yourself. They run hardest when you are tired or under scrutiny. Most people have two or three that do nearly all the damage.
| Pattern | What it sounds like | The question that tests it |
|---|---|---|
| All or nothing | "That was a disaster." It went 80 per cent well. | Where does this sit out of 100? |
| Mind reading | "They think I am not across it." | What did they actually say or do? |
| Fortune telling | "This is going to go badly," said as fact. | How often has that prediction been right before? |
| Catastrophising | One awkward conversation becomes losing the client. | What is most likely, rather than worst? |
| Should statements | "I should handle this without getting rattled." | Whose rule is that, and does it hold up? |
| Discounting the positive | "They only said that to be nice." | What would I have to ignore for this to be true? |
| Personalising | A short email read as being about you. | What else could explain it? |
| Emotional reasoning | "I feel out of my depth, so I must be." | What is the evidence, separate from the feeling? |
| Overgeneralising | "This always happens to me." | How many times, actually, and when did it not? |
| Labelling | "I am hopeless at delegating." | What would I say about the behaviour instead of the person? |
Not talking yourself out of it, and not thinking positively. The test is accuracy. A reframe you do not believe is just a nicer sentence, and it will not hold.
Would the new version survive being read out to someone who was there? If yes, it is accurate rather than comforting, and that is the one worth keeping. If the thought still returns after that, it is no longer a thinking problem. Move to the attention pages.
Catch one a day. It takes about three minutes and it works far better written down than done in your head.
Nothing yet. Complete the form above and add your first entry.
Paying attention to what is happening now, on purpose, without immediately judging it or fixing it. A skill of attention, not a mood. Not emptying your mind, and not relaxation. Use it for thoughts and feelings you want to disengage from rather than argue with, once you have already tested the evidence.
Feel your feet on the floor. One slow breath out. Name one sound. Before a difficult call, and nobody can tell.
Coffee, walking to the car, washing your hands. One routine action with full attention, daily.
What is here: thoughts, feelings, body. Narrow to the breath. Widen to the whole body and the room.
Attention outward: the sensation of walking, sounds, temperature. Each time you drift into planning, return to one sense.
Then it is working normally. Wandering and returning is the exercise, the way lifting and lowering is the exercise. Frequency beats duration.
Follow the circle. In as it grows, out as it shrinks. A longer out breath is what settles the body, so start with the first pattern. Six to ten cycles is plenty.
If counting makes you tense, drop the pattern and simply watch the breath as it already is.